People v. Huggins

112 A.D.3d 420, 975 N.Y.S.2d 671
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Huggins. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.3d 760

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obús, J., at suppression hearing; Thomas Farber, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered November 15, 2011, convicting defendant of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence. An officer saw defendant engaging in conduct that reasonably appeared to be robbery, rather than horseplay as defendant now suggests. Accordingly, the officer had probable cause for an arrest, which does not require exclusion of all [421]*421hypotheses of innocence (see e.g. People v Lewis, 50 AD3d 595 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 790 [2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Huggins, 112 A.D.3d 420, 975 N.Y.S.2d 671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

112 A.D.3d 420 (People v. Huggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lewis
50 A.D.3d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)