People v. Huggins

45 A.D.3d 1380, 845 N.Y.S.2d 609
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 9, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 1380 (People v. Huggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Huggins, 45 A.D.3d 1380, 845 N.Y.S.2d 609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered April 6, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.39 [1]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his contention that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence based upon his postplea conduct (see People v Lighthall, 6 AD3d 1170 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 643 [2004]; People v Baxter, 302 AD2d 950 [2003], lv denied 99 NY2d 652 [2003]). Nevertheless, we reject defendant’s contention that the court failed to make a sufficient inquiry before imposing the enhanced sentence. Defendant did not deny his involvement in the postplea crime or argue that there was no legitimate basis for his arrest, and thus the court did not err in failing to conduct an inquiry into the matter (see People v Wilson, 257 AD2d 674 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 981 [1999]; see generally People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 712-713 [1993]). Defendant’s further contention that the enhanced [1381]*1381sentence is unduly harsh and severe also is not encompassed by the waiver of the right to appeal “because the court failed to advise defendant of the potential period of incarceration that could be imposed” for an enhanced sentence (People v Trisvan, 8 AD3d 1067 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 682 [2004]; cf. People v Jackson, 34 AD3d 1318 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 923 [2007]; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]). We conclude, however, that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, P.J., Gorski, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Campbell
2025 NY Slip Op 07205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Lewis
2024 NY Slip Op 03254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Gayle
196 N.Y.S.3d 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Knee
2019 NY Slip Op 5566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Timmons
2019 NY Slip Op 3189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
TYO, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Tyo
140 A.D.3d 1697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
LEACH, JR., RAYMOND L., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Leach
119 A.D.3d 1429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
SCOTT, DENNIS, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Scott
101 A.D.3d 1773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
MILLS, DENNIS J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
PECK, KENLEY, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Mills
90 A.D.3d 1518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Peck
90 A.D.3d 1500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Billups
63 A.D.3d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Hendrix
62 A.D.3d 1261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Ayen
55 A.D.3d 1305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Laskowski
46 A.D.3d 1383 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.D.3d 1380, 845 N.Y.S.2d 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-huggins-nyappdiv-2007.