People v. Hudson

2 A.D.3d 230, 768 N.Y.S.2d 466, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13219
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered January 28, 2003, convicting defendant, on her plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing her to a term of SVa years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied youthful offender treatment. Since defendant was convicted of an armed felony, she was not eligible for youthful offender treatment in the absence of mitigating circumstances that “bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was committed” (CPL 720.10 [2] [a]; [3] [i]). The record does not establish such mitigating circumstances, and, given the circumstances of the crime, youthful offender treatment was not warranted in any event. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hudson, 2 A.D.3d 230, 768 N.Y.S.2d 466, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 230 (People v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Colon
175 N.Y.S.3d 154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Woullard
115 A.D.3d 1053 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)