People v. Hudson

259 N.E.2d 491, 26 N.Y.2d 980, 311 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1379
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1970·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defen[981]*981dant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that he had been deprived of his fundamental constitutional rights to a fair trial and to due process of law by the use at trial on cross-examination of a conversation with the arresting officer in the absence of the requisite warnings. (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436.) The Court of Appeals considered this contention and held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 26 N Y 2d 781.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hudson, 259 N.E.2d 491, 26 N.Y.2d 980, 311 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1379 (N.Y. 1970).

259 N.E.2d 491 (People v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)