People v. Hudson

Illinois Supreme Court

People v. Hudson

276 N.E.2d 345, 50 Ill. 2d 1, 1971 Ill. LEXIS 238

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 30, 1971

Docket43994

StatusPublished

Cited by19 cases

This text of 276 N.E.2d 345 (People v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hudson, 276 N.E.2d 345, 50 Ill. 2d 1, 1971 Ill. LEXIS 238 (Ill. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE UNDERWOOD

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, Howard C. Hudson, was found guilty of the unlawful sale of marijuana (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1963, ch. 38, par. 22—3), and sentenced to not less than 10 nor more than 14 years imprisonment. The appellate court affirmed the conviction (People v. Hudson, 266 N.E.2d 481), and we granted leave to appeal. It is necessary to consider only one of defendant’s several contentions: that the legislative classification of marijuana as a “narcotic drug” with its attendant sentencing provisions deprived the defendant of due process and equal protection of the law and constituted cruel and unusual punishment.

A majority of this court in People v. McCabe, 49 Ill.2d 338, held that the classification of marijuana in the Narcotic Drug Act (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 22—1 et seq.) under which defendant was convicted, is “arbritary and deprives the defendant of equal protection of the law,” thereby necessitating reversal of this judgment.

The judgments of the appellate and circuit courts are reversed.

Judgments reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE UNDERWOOD

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, Howard C. Hudson, was found guilty of the unlawful sale of marijuana (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1963, ch. 38, par. 22—3), and sentenced to not less than 10 nor more than 14 years imprisonment. The appellate court affirmed the conviction (People v. Hudson, 266 N.E.2d 481), and we granted leave to appeal. It is necessary to consider only one of defendant’s several contentions: that the legislative classification of marijuana as a “narcotic drug” with its attendant sentencing provisions deprived the defendant of due process and equal protection of the law and constituted cruel and unusual punishment.

A majority of this court in People v. McCabe, 49 Ill.2d 338, held that the classification of marijuana in the Narcotic Drug Act (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 22—1 et seq.) under which defendant was convicted, is “arbritary and deprives the defendant of equal protection of the law,” thereby necessitating reversal of this judgment.

The judgments of the appellate and circuit courts are reversed.

Judgments reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 N.E.2d 345, 50 Ill. 2d 1, 1971 Ill. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hudson-ill-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack