People v. Hubert

100 A.D.3d 1443, 953 N.Y.S.2d 536
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2012·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), [1444] rendered June 1, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that she knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]). Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Sconiers, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hubert, 100 A.D.3d 1443, 953 N.Y.S.2d 536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

100 A.D.3d 1443 (People v. Hubert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MCNAMARA, DAVID F., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. McNamara
103 A.D.3d 1273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)