People v. Hoyt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hoyt

233 A.D. 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 874 (People v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hoyt, 233 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. We affirm this order in the exercise of discretion, being of opinion that upon the facts an injunction pendente lite, as sought, would not be a proper disposition. We reserve opinion of the applicability of the Martin Act to this ease until we have for consideration a judgment based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs. We affirm this order in the exercise of discretion, being of opinion that upon the facts an injunction pendente lite, as sought, would not be a proper disposition. We reserve opinion of the applicability of the Martin Act to this ease until we have for consideration a judgment based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hoyt-nyappdiv-1931.