People v. Howell
Opinion
| People v Howell |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 05621 |
| Decided on November 8, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 8, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD
CARL J. LANDICINO, JJ.
2000-06288
(Ind. No. 5158/99)
v
Jerome Howell, appellant.
Jerome Howell, Otisville, NY, appellant pro se.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 12, 2004 (People v Howell, 11 AD3d 560), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 19, 2000.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., MALTESE, FORD and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
197 N.Y.S.3d 605 (People v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.