People v. Howell

169 A.D.2d 734

This text of 169 A.D.2d 734 (People v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Howell, 169 A.D.2d 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kellam, J.), both rendered July 18, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 5475/85, and robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 279/86, respectively, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A.D.2d 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-howell-nyappdiv-1991.