People v. Howard

2017 NY Slip Op 8688, 156 A.D.3d 724, 64 N.Y.S.3d 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 13, 2017
Docket2016-06637
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8688 (People v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Howard, 2017 NY Slip Op 8688, 156 A.D.3d 724, 64 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed May 13, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Kupershmidt, 152 AD3d 797 [2017]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, therefore, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Kupershmidt
2017 NY Slip Op 5850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 8688, 156 A.D.3d 724, 64 N.Y.S.3d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-howard-nyappdiv-2017.