People v. Howard

2017 NY Slip Op 8688, 156 A.D.3d 724, 64 N.Y.S.3d 893
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.3d 1654
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 2017·No. 2016-06637·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed May 13, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Kupershmidt, 152 AD3d 797 [2017]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, therefore, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Howard, 2017 NY Slip Op 8688, 156 A.D.3d 724, 64 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 8688 (People v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Kupershmidt
2017 NY Slip Op 5850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)