People v. Houston

222 A.D.2d 698, 636 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Houston. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 A.D.2d 535

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered July 22, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Houston, 222 A.D.2d 698, 636 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 698 (People v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)