People v. House

149 A.D.2d 962, 543 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5991

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, arguing that there was insufficient evidence of guilt. Viewed as a whole, and in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence of guilt, although wholly circumstantial, was sufficient (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 202-203). Defendant failed to object to the circumstantial evidence charge; thus, no issue of law with respect to the charge is presented for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Lynch, J.— burglary, second degree; petit larceny.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. House, 149 A.D.2d 962, 543 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

149 A.D.2d 962 (People v. House) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kennedy
391 N.E.2d 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)