People v. Hough

711 N.W.2d 80, 474 Mich. 1099
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hough. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 946
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 29, 2006·No. 129779·Published

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 80 (2006)
474 Mich. 1099

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dariel Ire HOUGH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 129779 & (25). COA No. 264422.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 29, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted and for appointment of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hough, 711 N.W.2d 80, 474 Mich. 1099 (Mich. 2006).

711 N.W.2d 80 (People v. Hough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.