People v. Hotz

14 P. 856, 73 Cal. 241, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 647
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 29, 1887
DocketNo. 20304
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 14 P. 856 (People v. Hotz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hotz, 14 P. 856, 73 Cal. 241, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 647 (Cal. 1887).

Opinion

Thornton, J.

— Indictment for an assault with a deadly weapon.

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendant a new trial.

One of the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made is, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.

An order granting a new trial, on such ground is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and is never disturbed by this court unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion by the trial court. We find no such abuse here.

We find no error in the refusal of. the instruction to which our attention is called.

The order is affirmed.

McFarland, J., Searls, C. J., Sharpstein, J., Temple,' J., McKinstry, J., and Paterson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lepkojes
292 P. 160 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
People v. Knutte
44 P. 166 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
People v. Flood
36 P. 663 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
People v. Lum Yit
23 P. 228 (California Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 P. 856, 73 Cal. 241, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hotz-cal-1887.