People v. Hotz

14 P. 856, 73 Cal. 241, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 647
California Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 1887·No. No. 20304·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Thornton, J.

— Indictment for an assault with a deadly weapon.

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendant a new trial.

One of the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made is, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.

An order granting a new trial, on such ground is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and is never disturbed by this court unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion by the trial court. We find no such abuse here.

We find no error in the refusal of. the instruction to which our attention is called.

The order is affirmed.

McFarland, J., Searls, C. J., Sharpstein, J., Temple,' J., McKinstry, J., and Paterson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hotz, 14 P. 856, 73 Cal. 241, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 647 (Cal. 1887).

14 P. 856 (People v. Hotz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lepkojes
292 P. 160 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
People v. Knutte
44 P. 166 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
People v. Flood
36 P. 663 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
People v. Lum Yit
23 P. 228 (California Supreme Court, 1890)