People v. Hosch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hosch

220 A.D.2d 529, 632 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9930

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 8, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Hatcher, 209 AD2d 639).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit (see, People v Williams, 161 AD2d 295, 296). Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 8, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Hatcher, 209 AD2d 639).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit (see, People v Williams, 161 AD2d 295, 296). Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Hosch, 220 A.D.2d 529, 632 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

220 A.D.2d 529 (People v. Hosch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related