People v. Horton

129 A.D.3d 1625, 10 N.Y.S.3d 479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Horton. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 A.D.3d 1192

Opinion

Appeal from a

judgment of the Steuben County Court (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), rendered July 9, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree and attempted kidnapping in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law § 155.40 [1]) and attempted kidnapping in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 135.20), defendant contends that his negotiated sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]), we reject that challenge.

Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Horton, 129 A.D.3d 1625, 10 N.Y.S.3d 479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

129 A.D.3d 1625 (People v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)