People v. Horton

79 A.D.2d 564, 433 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Horton. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 A.D.2d 1082

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered December 14, 1978, convicting defendant after a jury trial of assault in [565]*565the second degree unanimously affirmed. The admission of defendant’s station house statement into evidence, if error, was under all the circumstances harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (See People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230.) Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to determine whether the trial court correctly held that the People had met its burden of proving that defendant had knowingly and intelligently waived her constitutional rights. (See North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369; cf. People v Schroder, 71 AD2d 907.) As to the conceded errors by the trial court in his charge with regard to justification, the record discloses no objections by defense counsel, and we do not deem the errors sufficient in the light of all the evidence to warrant our reversing in the interest of justice. (See CPL 470.15, subd 3,. par [c].) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Sandler and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Horton, 79 A.D.2d 564, 433 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

79 A.D.2d 564 (People v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Carolina v. Butler
441 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1979)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Schroder
71 A.D.2d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)