People v. Horton

272 A.D.2d 924
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Horton. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 A.D. 1059

Opinion

Judgment of the Kings County Court, convicting defendant of the crime of bigamy as charged in indictment No. 1763/1945 and sentencing him to imprisonment in Sing Sing Prison for an indeterminate term, reversed on the law, the ‘ indictment dismissed and defendant discharged. The record establishes that the prior marriage Upon which the charge of bigamy is predicated was void for the reason that at the time that prior marriage was contracted the accused had a wife living from whom he had not been divorced and whose marriage had not been dissolved. (People v. Corbett, 49 App. Div. 514; People v. Dunbar, 194 App. Div. 144; Domestic Relations Law, § 13.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Horton, 272 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

272 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Corbett
49 A.D. 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
People v. Dunbar
194 A.D. 144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)