People v. Horsford
68 A.D.3d 556, 889 N.Y.2d 844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[557] The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its resolution of alleged inconsistencies in testimony. The identification was particularly reliable because the undercover officer followed defendant after the sale and led the field team to him. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Horsford, 68 A.D.3d 556, 889 N.Y.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 556 (People v. Horsford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. De Leon Garcia (Simon)
74 Misc. 3d 129(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. McCain (Malik)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018