People v. Horsford
This text of 68 A.D.3d 556 (People v. Horsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[557]*557The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its resolution of alleged inconsistencies in testimony. The identification was particularly reliable because the undercover officer followed defendant after the sale and led the field team to him. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 556, 889 N.Y.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-horsford-nyappdiv-2009.