People v. Hornick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hornick

202 A.D.2d 927, 610 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3072

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 927 (People v. Hornick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hornick, 202 A.D.2d 927, 610 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered March 26, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Upon his plea of guilty, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of imprisonment of IVi to 3 years. Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed, which is the most lenient possible under the circumstances of this case. Given these facts, and in view of defendant’s prior criminal record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered March 26, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Upon his plea of guilty, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of imprisonment of IVi to 3 years. Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed, which is the most lenient possible under the circumstances of this case. Given these facts, and in view of defendant’s prior criminal record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 927, 610 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hornick-nyappdiv-1994.