People v. Horner

259 A.D.2d 1039, 689 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3468

This text of 259 A.D.2d 1039 (People v. Horner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Horner, 259 A.D.2d 1039, 689 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant without the benefit of an updated presentence investigation report. Defendant waived an update of the pre-plea report prepared eight months [1040]*1040earlier, and the court was familiar with the changes in defendant’s status after the preparation of that report (see, People v Sinclair, 231 AD2d 926; People v Hemingway, 222 AD2d 1102, lv denied 87 NY2d 1020). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hemingway
222 A.D.2d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Sinclair
231 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 1039, 689 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-horner-nyappdiv-1999.