People v. Horace

231 A.D.2d 948, 648 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly resentenced defendant in order to correct its error in imposing a sentence that did not conform to the plea agreement (see, People v Minaya, 54 NY2d 360, cert denied 455 US 1024; see also, People v Wright, 56 NY2d 613; People v Monereau, 181 AD2d 918, lv denied 79 NY2d 1052). The correction "not only [was] evident from the record but also fully comported with the expectation of the court, the prosecutor and the defendant at the time sentence was imposed” (Matter of Campbell v Pesce, 60 NY2d 165, 169; see, People v Monereau, supra, at 919). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Unauthorized Practice.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Horace, 231 A.D.2d 948, 648 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

231 A.D.2d 948 (People v. Horace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Howard
1 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Ballard
234 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)