People v. Hopkins

28 A.D.3d 1244, 812 N.Y.S.2d 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (James R. Harvey, J), rendered October 27, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of falsifying business records in the first degree and petit larceny.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, upon a jury verdict, of falsifying business records in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.10) and petit larceny (§ 155.25). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the conviction of falsifying business records is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The People presented evidence establishing that defendant “cause[d] a false entry in the business records of an enterprise” (Penal Law § 175.05 [1]), i.e., that she returned merchandise that she had not in fact purchased, and that she thereby “inten[ded] ... to aid or conceal [her] commission” of the crime of larceny (§ 175.10). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hopkins, 28 A.D.3d 1244, 812 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 1244 (People v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RAMIREZ, MARIA F., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Ramirez
99 A.D.3d 1241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)