People v. Hook

210 N.E.2d 462, 16 N.Y.2d 831, 263 N.Y.S.2d 174, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hook. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.2d 776
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 9, 1965·Published

Opinion

Application to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that evidence sought to be used against him should have been suppressed because it was procured by an unlawful search and seizure, in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 15 N Y 2d 776.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hook, 210 N.E.2d 462, 16 N.Y.2d 831, 263 N.Y.S.2d 174, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1261 (N.Y. 1965).

210 N.E.2d 462 (People v. Hook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.