People v. Hood
This text of 136 A.D.2d 569 (People v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), rendered July 1, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the People, was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).
We find that the prosecutor’s comments did not deny defendant a fair trial in view of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt (see, People v Wood, 66 NY2d 374).
The sentence which was imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85).
We find the defendant’s remaining contention to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 A.D.2d 569, 523 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hood-nyappdiv-1988.