People v. Hood
This text of 6 Cal. 236 (People v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
The indictment in this case charges the accused of the crime of arson, in this, that on a certain day, etc., “ he did burn or cause to be burned, a certain dwelling house, etc.”
This is not a sufficient description of the offence; first, because the charge is laid in the alternative, whereas it should be special; and second, because the facts and circumstances of the alleged offence are not set forth in such a manner as to apprise the prisoner of the offénce charged against him, so that he may be prepared for his defence. See the case of the People v. Aro, April term, 1856.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 236, 1856 Cal. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hood-cal-1856.