People v. Honsenfratts
3 Cow. 26
Opinion
The defendant must be discharged. The plaintiffs have proceeded irregularly. The lessor of the plaintiff should also have been served with a taxed bill of the costs, by shewing him the original and delivering a copy, before moving for the attachment-
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Honsenfratts, 3 Cow. 26 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
3 Cow. 26 (People v. Honsenfratts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ceridian Corporation v. Scsc Corp
212 F.3d 398 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. James N. Williams (91-3713), Americo Argentieri (91-3714)
966 F.2d 1455 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Gibbons v. Goodrich
3 Ill. App. 590 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1878)
Alston v. Alston
4 S.C. 116 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1873)