People v. Homan

521 P.2d 1262, 185 Colo. 56, 1974 Colo. LEXIS 865
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided May 6, 1974·No. 25783·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Rickey Lee Homan was charged and convicted of simply robbery. C.R.S. 1963, 40-5-1. On appeal, he contends that the trial judge committed reversible error in overruling his objection and permitting cross-examination to extend beyond the scope of direct examination.

A trial judge has discretion to determine the scope and the limit of cross-examination. In the absence of an abuse of discretion, the trial judge’s ruling will not be disturbed on review. Archina v. People, 135 Colo. 8, 307 P.2d 1083 (1957). Accord, People v. King, 179 Colo. 94, 498 P.2d 1142 (1972). See also Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence for the United States District Courts and Magistrates, Rule 6-11; 3A, J. Wigmore, Evidence § 944 (Chadbourn rev. 1970); C. McCormick, Evidence § 24 (2d ed. 1972).

Accordingly, we affirm.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PRINGLE does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Homan, 521 P.2d 1262, 185 Colo. 56, 1974 Colo. LEXIS 865 (Colo. 1974).

521 P.2d 1262 (People v. Homan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harris
762 P.2d 651 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1988)
People v. Lucero
677 P.2d 370 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Marin
686 P.2d 1351 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Cushon
539 P.2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1975)