People v. . Holzman

New York Court of Appeals

People v. . Holzman

134 N.E. 569, 232 N.Y. 553, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 585

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 13, 1921

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 N.E. 569 (People v. . Holzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. . Holzman, 134 N.E. 569, 232 N.Y. 553, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 585 (N.Y. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this case fails to disclose facts sufficient to justify a conclusion that the defendant made or had in his possession tools under circumstances evincing an intent to use or employ, or allow the same to *554 be used or employed, in the commission of a crime, or that he had knowledge that the said tools were intended to be' so used. " '

The judgments should be reversed and a new .trial granted. - .

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur - Pound, J.,-absent. Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this case fails to disclose facts sufficient to justify a conclusion that the defendant made or had in his possession tools under circumstances evincing an intent to use or employ, or allow the same to *554 be used or employed, in the commission of a crime, or that he had knowledge that the said tools were intended to be' so used. " '

The judgments should be reversed and a new .trial granted. - .

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur - Pound, J.,-absent. Judgments reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 N.E. 569, 232 N.Y. 553, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holzman-ny-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack