People v. Holt

2019 NY Slip Op 1953
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2019
Docket354 KA 16-01951
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1953 (People v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holt, 2019 NY Slip Op 1953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Holt (2019 NY Slip Op 01953)
People v Holt
2019 NY Slip Op 01953
Decided on March 15, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 15, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

354 KA 16-01951

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

RASHAUN A. HOLT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (RICHARD L. SULLIVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (David W. Foley, A.J.), rendered September 29, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.06 [5]), defendant contends that his agreed-upon sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's contention is not encompassed by his waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis in the record to exercise our power to modify defendant's negotiated sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). We note that defendant has four prior felony drug convictions and that he was on parole when he committed this offense.

Entered: March 15, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 110.00
New York PEN § 110.00

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holt-nyappdiv-2019.