People v. Holmes

16 A.D.3d 598, 790 N.Y.S.2d 878, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2967

This text of 16 A.D.3d 598 (People v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holmes, 16 A.D.3d 598, 790 N.Y.S.2d 878, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 29, 2004 (People v Holmes, 5 AD3d 793 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered October 30, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Holmes
5 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.3d 598, 790 N.Y.S.2d 878, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holmes-nyappdiv-2005.