People v. Holmes
286 A.D.2d 936, 733 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Holmes. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 A.D.2d 871 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2001·Published
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that County Court improperly enhanced his sentence without offering him an opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty is not preserved for our review {see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Santos, 283 AD2d 998) and, in any event, is without merit. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Holmes, 286 A.D.2d 936, 733 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
286 A.D.2d 936 (People v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Santos
283 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)