People v. Holmes

155 A.D.2d 330, 547 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14095
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Holmes. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.2d 908

Opinion

— Three judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Bookson, J.), rendered on April 13, 1988, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of one count of robbery in the first degree pursuant to each judgment and sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit qf his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Ross, J. P., Asch, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Holmes, 155 A.D.2d 330, 547 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

155 A.D.2d 330 (People v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Felman
141 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)