People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holmes

112 A.D.2d 739, 492 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56101

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Proof of defendant’s conviction of a subsequent unrelated charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument was admissible to prove defendant’s knowledge of the forgery in the instant case (People v Molineux, 168 NY 264, 297-298; see also, People v Schwartzman, 24 NY2d 241; People v Dales, 309 NY 97,101).

We have examined defendant’s other claim of error and find it without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Cornelius, J. — criminal possession of forged instrument, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Proof of defendant’s conviction of a subsequent unrelated charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument was admissible to prove defendant’s knowledge of the forgery in the instant case (People v Molineux, 168 NY 264, 297-298; see also, People v Schwartzman, 24 NY2d 241; People v Dales, 309 NY 97,101).

We have examined defendant’s other claim of error and find it without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Cornelius, J. — criminal possession of forged instrument, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

People v. Holmes, 112 A.D.2d 739, 492 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

112 A.D.2d 739 (People v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related