People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holmes

27 A.D.2d 843, 278 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Holmes, 27 A.D.2d 843, 278 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 1, 1965, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable (People v. Brown, 26 A D 2d 779). However, we have examined the record and considered, defendant’s contention; and, if we did not dismiss the appeal, we would have affirmed the order (People v. [844]*844Gross, 5 N Y 2d 131; People v. Sullivan, 3 N Y 2d 196). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 1, 1965, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable (People v. Brown, 26 A D 2d 779). However, we have examined the record and considered, defendant’s contention; and, if we did not dismiss the appeal, we would have affirmed the order (People v. [844]*844Gross, 5 N Y 2d 131; People v. Sullivan, 3 N Y 2d 196). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 843, 278 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holmes-nyappdiv-1967.