People v. Holmes

227 A.D. 734
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order vacating subpoena reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that section 352 of the General Business Law, as amended by chapter'365 of the Laws of 1927, empowers the Attorney-General to subpoena and examine a person, who is a party to a civil proceeding or action, after the commencement of the proceeding or action. The exercise of such power by the Attorney-General does not violate any of- defendant’s constitutional rights, which are specifically preserved by the provisions of section 359 of said law. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Holmes, 227 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 734 (People v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.
39 Misc. 2d 840 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
People v. Clenner
159 Misc. 860 (New York County Courts, 1936)
Carlisle v. Bennett
197 N.E. 220 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Carlisle v. Bennett
153 Misc. 151 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)