People v. Holman
This text of 159 N.Y.S.3d 907 (People v. Holman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Holman |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 01176 |
| Decided on February 23, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT J. MILLER
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2019-09483
v
Kareem Holman, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel; Yasmine Bailey on the memorandum), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ellen E. Edwards, J.), imposed June 28, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
CONNOLLY, J.P., RIVERA, MILLER and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 N.Y.S.3d 907, 202 A.D.3d 1106, 2022 NY Slip Op 01176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holman-nyappdiv-2022.