People v. Holman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holman

79 A.D.3d 1150, 914 N.Y.S.2d 909

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 2010·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 23, 1998 (People v Holman, 248 AD2d 637 [1998]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 6, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 23, 1998 (People v Holman, 248 AD2d 637 [1998]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 6, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Santucci, JJ., concur.

People v. Holman, 79 A.D.3d 1150, 914 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

79 A.D.3d 1150 (People v. Holman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related