People v. Holloman

29 A.D.3d 433, 813 N.Y.S.2d 907

This text of 29 A.D.3d 433 (People v. Holloman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holloman, 29 A.D.3d 433, 813 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dora Irizarry, J., at hearing and plea; Arlene Silverman, J, at sentence), rendered September 9, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4x/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claim (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would, in any event, reject his suppression arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.3d 433, 813 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holloman-nyappdiv-2006.