People v. Holloman

246 A.D.2d 605, 667 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 367

This text of 246 A.D.2d 605 (People v. Holloman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holloman, 246 A.D.2d 605, 667 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 22, 1996 (People v Holloman, 226 AD2d 654), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 17, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Sullivan and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Holloman
226 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D.2d 605, 667 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holloman-nyappdiv-1998.