People v. Hollister
Opinion
Appeal from judgments of the County Court of Chemung County, both rendered August 12, 1975, convicting defendant, on separate pleas of guilty, of the crime of attempted forgery in the second degree and the crime of burglary in the third degree and imposing two concurrent indeterminate sentences not to exceed three years. Defendant, [960] on this appeal, asserts the sentences are unduly harsh and excessive. The concurrent indeterminate sentences are not unduly harsh and excessive and this court will not, under the circumstances present herein, interfere with the discretion of the trial court (People v Caputo, 13 AD2d 861). Judgments affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
52 A.D.2d 959 (People v. Hollister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.