Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hollins

People v. Hollins

278 A.D.2d 932, 718 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13410
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Hollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hollins, 278 A.D.2d 932, 718 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13410 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). “In a bench trial, no less than a jury trial, the resolution of credibility issues by the trier of fact and its determination of the weight to be accorded the evidence presented are entitled to great deference” (People v Van Akin, 197 AD2d 845). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DAVIS, CHAZ K., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
SEBRING, RICKY, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Britt
298 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 932, 718 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hollins-nyappdiv-2000.