People v. Hollins
227 N.E.2d 407, 19 N.Y.2d 864, 280 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1518
Opinion
Judgments reversed and indictment dismissed upon the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the guilt of defendants beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Lindsey, 12 N Y 2d 958, affg. 16 A D 2d 805.)
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that there was sufficient evidence upon which the jury could find that both defendants were sellers of narcotics rather than purchasers or agents for the police.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hollins, 227 N.E.2d 407, 19 N.Y.2d 864, 280 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1518 (N.Y. 1967).
227 N.E.2d 407 (People v. Hollins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Boudin
90 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Lam Lek Chong
379 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Roche
379 N.E.2d 208 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)