Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Hollins

People v. Hollins

227 N.E.2d 407, 19 N.Y.2d 864, 280 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1518
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 227 N.E.2d 407 (People v. Hollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hollins, 227 N.E.2d 407, 19 N.Y.2d 864, 280 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1518 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Judgments reversed and indictment dismissed upon the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the guilt of defendants beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Lindsey, 12 N Y 2d 958, affg. 16 A D 2d 805.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that there was sufficient evidence upon which the jury could find that both defendants were sellers of narcotics rather than purchasers or agents for the police.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Boudin
90 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Lam Lek Chong
379 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Roche
379 N.E.2d 208 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.E.2d 407, 19 N.Y.2d 864, 280 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hollins-ny-1967.