People v. Holliday

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holliday

11 A.D.3d 727, 782 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 727 (People v. Holliday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Holliday, 11 A.D.3d 727, 782 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered December 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement which included the waiver of the right to appeal, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 4V2 to 9 years. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application to be relieved of his assignment is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered December 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement which included the waiver of the right to appeal, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 4V2 to 9 years. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application to be relieved of his assignment is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 727, 782 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holliday-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack