People v. Holley

325 N.E.2d 874, 36 N.Y.2d 700, 366 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1731
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 325 N.E.2d 874 (People v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holley, 325 N.E.2d 874, 36 N.Y.2d 700, 366 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1731 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted to the fpllowing extent and otherwise denied. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant-appellant argued that his rights under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated because the affidavit of Ronald Smith in support of the application for the search warrant failed to set forth sufficient -probable cause to support the issuance of the warrant. [See 35 N Y 2d 778.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 N.E.2d 874, 36 N.Y.2d 700, 366 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holley-ny-1975.