People v. Holley
This text of 731 N.W.2d 426 (People v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Julias HOLLEY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether MCL 750.483a(1)(b) requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that a person committed or attempted to commit a crime. They may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
731 N.W.2d 426, 478 Mich. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holley-mich-2007.