People v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holland

242 A.D.2d 735, 664 N.Y.S.2d 939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 735 (People v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Holland, 242 A.D.2d 735, 664 N.Y.S.2d 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Egitto, J.), imposed October 11, 1995.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Egitto, J.), imposed October 11, 1995.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 735, 664 N.Y.S.2d 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holland-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack