People v. Holland

714 N.W.2d 657, 475 Mich. 871

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Holland. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 974 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 2006·No. 130536·Published

Opinion

714 N.W.2d 657 (2006) 475 Mich. 871

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Randy William HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130536. COA No. 262267.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

714 N.W.2d 657 (2006) 475 Mich. 871

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Randy William HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130536. COA No. 262267.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

People v. Holland, 714 N.W.2d 657, 475 Mich. 871 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

714 N.W.2d 657 (People v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy William HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Randy William HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.