People v. Holibaugh

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Holibaugh

195 N.W.2d 881, 38 Mich. App. 198, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1564

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 1972

DocketDocket No. 11189

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 N.W.2d 881 (People v. Holibaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Holibaugh, 195 N.W.2d 881, 38 Mich. App. 198, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1564 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty to larceny over $100 (MCLA § 750.356 [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.588]) in the Hillsdale County Circuit Court. He appeals of right.

Defendant was originally charged with armed robbery. MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). The information was orally amended at his arraignment to include larceny over $100. Defendant argues the failure to reduce this to writing inadequately informed him of the charge against him. No objection to this was raised at the arraignment. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error. MCLA § 767.76 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1016). This Court will not consider such an objection for the first time on appeal. People v. Kildow (1969), 19 Mich 194.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty to larceny over $100 (MCLA § 750.356 [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.588]) in the Hillsdale County Circuit Court. He appeals of right.

Defendant was originally charged with armed robbery. MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797). The information was orally amended at his arraignment to include larceny over $100. Defendant argues the failure to reduce this to writing inadequately informed him of the charge against him. No objection to this was raised at the arraignment. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error. MCLA § 767.76 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1016). This Court will not consider such an objection for the first time on appeal. People v. Kildow (1969), 19 Mich 194.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 N.W.2d 881, 38 Mich. App. 198, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holibaugh-michctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack