People v. Holdip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holdip

87 A.D.2d 598, 450 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 598 (People v. Holdip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Holdip, 87 A.D.2d 598, 450 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.), rendered February 28,1980, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review, inter alia, the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Judgment affirmed. Defendant’s assertions as to assigned trial counsel’s failure to heed his request to interpose an insanity defense, being raised for the first time on appeal, is matter dehors this record and possibly the subject of an application pursuant to CPL 440.10. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.), rendered February 28,1980, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review, inter alia, the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Judgment affirmed. Defendant’s assertions as to assigned trial counsel’s failure to heed his request to interpose an insanity defense, being raised for the first time on appeal, is matter dehors this record and possibly the subject of an application pursuant to CPL 440.10. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 598, 450 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holdip-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack